home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nwlink.com!usenet
- From: nes@nwlink.com (Nick Schirmer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: 1950/1960 monitors: what's the difference?
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 23:53:15 GMT
- Organization: Northwest Link
- Message-ID: <4d6sd9$27k@texas.nwlink.com>
- References: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960107023302.622F-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu> <678.6580T744T1319@crl.com>
- Reply-To: nes@nwlink.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: port13.annex4.nwlink.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- joewald@crl.com (Joseph Waldvogel) wrote:
-
-
- >>Hi; can anyone explain what the difference is between these two Commodore
- >>monitors? I'm planning on using it with a Picasso II in my A2000.
-
- >>Any general or specific information like dot pitch, scan rates,
- >>resolution, and *reliability* would be helpful -- thanks a lot.
-
- >Well I believe the 1950 is a true Multi-Scan Monitor, where is the 1960 is
- >just a Tri-Scan Monitor.
-
- It is NOT a Tri-Sync. It goes between 15.xx and 35.5 (according to the
- manual, but others have said it goes to 38.00) I know this, its a lot
- better than my 1024x768i SVGA monitor on my IBM System.
-
- |
- /-----------------------------------\ | .
- |Nick Schirmer *-----* | | | |
- |NES@NWLink.com |Escom| | | | |
- |HTTP://NWLink.com/~nes |Amiga| | | | |
- | *-----* | | | |
- | | | | |
- | Travel to HTTP://WWW.AMIGA.DE | | | | |
- | or HTTP://NWLink.com/~nes/Amiga/ | | | | | |
- \-----------------------------------/ \______________________/
- Amiga SGI IBM Macintosh
- The Average IQ of each kind of computer user!
-
-